FootyChatter.com

By WILL PICKWORTH, SPORTS REPORTER Published: 22: 18 AEDT, 10 February 2026 | Updated: 23: 59 AEDT, 10 February 2026 493 View comments Eni Aluko and Simon Jordan clashed on talk SPORT as the fallout from her comments surrounding Ian Wright continues. Aluko hit the headlines again last weekend after calling for women's football to be 'gatekept', reiterating her view that male pundits, such as Wright, are blocking opportunities in the game. The 38-year-old sparked controversy last April when she claimed former Arsenal and England forward Wright needed to be aware of 'how much he's doing in the women's game'. Despite apologising for her comments 10 months ago, Aluko reignited her war of words with Wright on the 90s Baby Show podcast. Her major issue appeared to be that Wright and Nedum Onuoha were two of the six pundits across ITV and the BBC during the Women's Euros final last summer, while herself and fellow Lionesses legend Fara Williams were not involved. On Tuesday, she appeared on talk SPORT with Jim White and Jordan to defend her position. But in one particular moment, as the show returned from an advert break, Jordan and Aluko could be seen embroiled in a furious clash. Eni Aluko and Simon Jordan clashed on talk SPORT as the fallout from her comments surrounding Ian Wright continues Aluko appeared on the show to clarify her comments on Ian Wright and women's football Aluko has previously accused Wright of blocking opportunities for women in football  Before the break, Jordan had launched a blistering attack on Aluko, branding her not 'particularly enlightening, illuminating, engaging or charismatic'.   He added that he didn't feel Aluko 'comes across as particularly likeable'. Jordan, the former Crystal Palace owner, later explained: 'The language that you use is, to me, it's steeped in the sense of entitlement. 'The sheer weight of the entitlement you seem to believe you have would sink the weight of the Titanic. I think you have been quite fortuitous.   'I think because of initiatives like diversity, equity and inclusion, they've allowed people to be put into positions in the men's game that I don't think they've merited. ' As the show returned after the break, viewers on the radio show's You Tube channel could see Jordan and Aluko appearing to be in the middle of a heated argument. Jordan was seen waving his arms in the air and gesticulating in the direction of Aluko, who looked less than impressed. The former England international pulled a face and looked away from Jordan. Aluko came back into the spotlight over the weekend after calling for women's football to be 'gatekept', reigniting her feud with the hugely popular Wright Speaking at the start of her appearance on the show, Aluko said: 'I think it's more about clarifying and saying look, I think 270 caps (the number shared between Aluko and Williams) represent experience and the insight you can bring to the game.   'What I wasn't saying is that 270 caps justifies an instant pick, of course, you need a skillset to be a pundit. 'The point I was trying to make is, that in women's football, my opinion is that where there's a choice, I want to see that level of experience on the main panel for women's football. 'That's not at the exclusion of Nedum Onuoha or Ian Wright. I'm saying can we have a situation where women are the main faces of women's sport and then the men play more of a supporting role? 'Ian Wright could do 10-minute hits before the game, a bit of colour, bit of context, then back to the main studio and bang, you've got the faces of the game, whoever the three female pundits are. ' After admitting he understood where she was coming from, Jordan, who was sat next to Aluko, added: 'I think we live in a society where people don't have the experience and substance, don't know what they're talking about [and are] masquerading as experts. 'With all due respect to women in men's football, I think they have zero expertise in men's football. 'I think they can talk about tactics but the two games are vastly different – the speed, the scale, the pressure, the physicality. They are vastly different games. ' Jordan branded Aluko as not 'particularly enlightening, illuminating, engaging or charismatic' He continued: 'I've encountered Eni in short form and long form, we had a conversation about the commerciality of football which I thought Eni talked with no commercial sense. That is my opinion, she probably disagrees. 'I've seen her talking on podcasts where she's ideologically aligned with a perspective that overrepresentation is on merit and underrepresentation is based on structural racism. 'I find that a difficult circle to square. As far as expertise is concerned, the times that I've listened to her I don't think that she's particularly enlightening, illuminating, engaging or charismatic. 'I don't think she comes across particularly likeable but that's my view, but some people have the same view of me. ' Aluko had also aimed a dig at her former colleague Laura Woods, who had criticised Aluko for her comments on Monday after taking to X.    Woods said: 'Caps don't win automatic work and they don't make a brilliant pundit either. The way you communicate, articulate yourself, do your research, inform your audience, how likeable you are and the chemistry you have with your panel are what makes a brilliant pundit. '"The women's game should be by women for women" is one of the most damaging phrases I've heard. It will not only drag women's sport backwards, it will drag women's punditry in all forms of the game backwards. The former Lionesses star also accused her former ITV colleague Laura Woods of 'gaslighting' her  'If you want to grow something, you don't gatekeep it. We want to encourage little boys and men to watch women's football too, not just little girls and women. And when they see someone like Ian Wright taking it as seriously as he does - they follow suit. That's how you grow a sport. ' Woods continued in another post:  'Here's a picture of our team at ITV. We won best production at the Broadcast Sport Awards 2025 for our coverage of the Women's Euros. Seb Hutchinson won best commentator too. So I think ITV got it just right. ' When pressed on Woods' comments, Aluko accused the popular TV host of 'gaslighting' her. 'It's interesting because Laura is one of the people I would consistently go to, we got on like a house on fire, ' she said.   'I would consistently go to her and say, 'How do you think it went? What do you think? How did it go? ' I'm that sort of person. 'I had to look at the messages yesterday and think, hold on, I feel a bit gaslit here. Laura consistently said to me, "I think you're a brilliant broadcaster. I think you're a brilliant pundit. " 'So I think there's a little bit of serving her argument at this point, which I respect. She doesn't agree, and that's fine. But I think there's an insinuation in there that you don't meet the standard. 'I've worked too hard for people to conclude that because you're not seeing me on screen, I'm not good enough. That's not true. '

Share what you think

The comments below have not been moderated.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of Mail Online.

By posting your comment you agree to our house rules. Do you want to automatically post your Mail Online comments to your Facebook Timeline? Your comment will be posted to Mail Online as usual.   Do you want to automatically post your Mail Online comments to your Facebook Timeline? Your comment will be posted to Mail Online as usual We will automatically post your comment and a link to the news story to your Facebook timeline at the same time it is posted on Mail Online. To do this we will link your Mail Online account with your Facebook account. We’ll ask you to confirm this for your first post to Facebook. You can choose on each post whether you would like it to be posted to Facebook. Your details from Facebook will be used to provide you with tailored content, marketing and ads in line with our Privacy Policy.